-[Harpreet Singh Dhillon]
The persistent problem of poverty
in the developing world has put a question mark on the relation between economic growth and poverty. Some individuals are of the opinion that when economy develops, because of industrial growth, poverty comes down. Others believe that
economic
growth leads to poverty. This essay intends to analyse both perspectives. l, however, agree with the former view.
To begin with,
industrial
growth benefits nearly all citizens of a country, even if not
equally,
and therefore reduces poverty. For example, in rural areas, most of the poor are engaged in
agriculture.
When such a
country grows through agricultural exports, it benefits both poor farmers and the even poorer labourers they
employ.
Similarly, rapid growth in manufacturing
sector because
of increase in demand creates a lot of new jobs, and eventually causes a rise in wages that further reduces poverty.
My second argument
comes from historical records. Western countries began discovering the positive relation between economic growth and poverty reduction around 1820 and as a result the living standards in Europe and the United States improved many fold in the next years. Economic growth thus eliminated mass poverty in what is today considered the
developed
world. Even a short-term view confirms that the recent acceleration of growth in many developing countries has reduced poverty, measured the same way.
The opponents of this view claim that economic progress leads to inequality between the rich and the poor. They opine
that a handful of rich are getting richer while the poor are being driven to the wall. However, results have proved that such inequality is only short lived and everyone has benefited in the long run. lt is because of the high initial inequality that it appears as if economic growth is leading to poverty.
Summing up, industrial progress definitely reduces poverty. Sometimes, there is unequal
distribution of wealth in the initial stages of economic development. Nonetheless, everyone benefits eventually.
Post a Comment